Conjecture 1: Terrorism has lowered the nuclear threshold
"...the nuclear threshold against a terrorism may be crossed once they get the capability to attack with weapons of mass destruction. Unlike the old early warning systems, designed to gauge Soviet intent, the intelligence systems of the War on Terror are meant to measure capability. The relevant Cold War question was 'do they intend to use the Bomb?'. In the War on Terror, the relevant question is simply 'do they have the Bomb?' This puts the nuclear threshold very low."
Conjecture 2: Attaining WMDs will destroy Islam
The so-called strengths of Islamic terrorism: fanatical intent; lack of a centralized leadership; absence of a final authority and cellular structure guarantee uncontrollable escalation once the nuclear threshold is crossed. Therefore the 'rational' American response to the initiation of terrorist WMD attack would be all out retaliation from the outset."
He goes on to add that even if the US did not annihilate the Islamic world, the Islamists would turn on and destroy each other.
Conjecture 3: The War on Terror is the 'Golden Hour' -- the final chance
It is supremely ironic that the survival of the Islamic world should hinge on an American victory in the War on Terror, the last chance to prevent that terrible day in which all the decisions will have already been made for us. That effort really consists of two separate aspects: a campaign to destroy the locus of militant Islam and prevent their acquisition of WMDs; and an attempt to awaken the world to the urgency of the threat. While American arms have proven irresistible, much of Europe, as well as moderates in the Islamic world, remain blind to the danger and indeed increase it. Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad recently "told an international conference of young Muslim leaders ... (that) ... Muslims must acquire skills and technology so they can create modern weapons and strike fear into the hearts of our enemies". Fecklessness and gunpowder are a lethal combination. The terrible ifs accumulate.
According to these three conjectures, Islam could very well be currently "going out in a blaze of glory."
We'll see.
1 comment:
Wow!
Very interesting!
I've never met anyone who doubts that the MUSLIM RADICALS, upon obtaining a "greater" weapon, would use it. Does this mean that the U.S. and it's allies will automatically utilize our own "greater" weapons to iradicate that threat?
No! ... I'm afraid not! Look at the recent revelation that Zarqawi was implicating Iran in the War on Terror ... (as a setup for placing Shiite against Sunni) Any American leader, or allied leader, will hesitate because of the "indirectness" of the threat. Is it Iran? ..., is it Syria? ..., is it Osama's bunch? ..., etc ...
If the U.S. and it's allies were serious about the WOT they would be aggressively ATTACKING the general muslim middle east AND non- middle east muslims, either by direct military action and/or covert/subversive action. I have NO REASON TO BELIEVE this is happening. Is the Iranian President a NUT? Sure he is ... Are some fighters coming across the Iranian and Syrian borders? ... most likey! Estimates, as reported by FOXNEWS, are that about 10% of the "Insurgents" in Iraq are foreign. Is the Saudi Royal family our friend? ... DON'T MAKE ME PUKE!
As for the survival of Islam (which is the Muslim world on Earth), it may very well be that our efforts actually help Islam to survive. But, comparing the Persians (Iranians) to the Palestinians is a mistake. It's like comparing the Jewish Israelis to the pagan Egyptians - no comparison! In other words, just like some places in America; inner city youths compared to country kids; for example, not all "groups" will turn on each other.
We must dramatically increase the scope and energy of our WAR ON TERROR. An inkling of what is needed has been illustrated by the recent and numerous raids in Iraq following Zarqawi's death. We cannot continue to do this when we're spending energy on:
-the C.F.R.
-the United Nations
-the fight with the Marxists Democrats and their institutions within our own country
-weak Republicans
-etc, etc ...
... we have a long way to go and much learning to accomplish ...
Post a Comment