Mr. Radu, makes a terrific case describing the U.N.'s pitfalls and problems, then says we should put up with it for "cultural" reasons. Only a liberal socialist would use that kind of logic! America cannot be isolationist but we can certainly communicate with our international neighbors without the U.N. To stay involved in the U.N. means eventual complete loss of our sovereignty and thus slavery.
1 comment:
Too true!
ET says..
**As for the UN, it's set up to fail. The comparison with other bureaucracies is a good analogy. A bureaucracy becomes a 'thing-in-itself'. It takes on its own shape, its own justification, it exists. And when you set one up that is not answerable to anything or anyone, then, you've created a garguantuan monster.**
And I agree. The same pattern of coruption that destroyed the LIBERAL party of Canada is presently a festering root rot in the UN.
In fact the actions of the UN have crossed well into the realm of criminality.
Is the lost $billion in the oil for food scandal not criminal?
Is the reporting of sensitive military info on their website for Hezbollah*s benifit not criminal.
Is six years observing the Hez building bunkers along the northern Israeli border and stocking same with rockets while saying nothing not criminal?
There are dozens of other examples, but I don*t want to be too boring.
Months ago, John Bolten said the US would look to another world body if the UN didn*t clean up their act.
I wish Bolton would nullify the UN now. = TG
Post a Comment