... finally, awareness is slowly starting!
"A congressman is pressing the Department of Commerce to fully disclose a congressionally unauthorized plan to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that critics say could lead to a North American union. "
- What is the membership of the 30 SPP working groups?
- What is the charge/working agenda of each of the 30 SPP working groups?
- Please provide to me any trilateral memoranda of understanding and other trilateral agreements with Mexico and Canada.
- Please provide findings, reports and presentations of the working groups.
- Under what congressional action are these working groups constituted?
- What congressional oversight is there of this process?
- Are the working groups redefining American laws to make them tri-lateral?
- What specific plans are there for reporting to Congress?
"The constituents' letter also suggested four lines of inquiry should congressional hearings be convened to examine SPP working group activities: "
- Is the sovereignty of the United States threatened since it has been reported that a North American court and a parliamentary body are being proposed, complete with the "Amero" to replace the U.S. dollar?
- Wouldn't an "outer security perimeter" remove the capacity of policing our borders from the hands of United States citizens?
- Isn't "harmonizing entry screening and visa and asylum regulations" code for a quantum leap in liberalizing our country's immigration laws?
- What about the May 2005 CFR Task Force documents calling for a "seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico" and for a "permanent tribunal for North American dispute regulation," as well as calling for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the U.S.
2 comments:
I pray that this is paranoia and conspiracy theory run amok.
Well, the planning and preparation for a profitable economic future is a good thing. The idea of a N.A.U. is not necessarily a bad idea.
The problem comes when this sort of planning is hidden and not talked about, openly, when inquiries are made.
If we, the USA, need to form a more "perfect economic union" to survive the future; so be it!
It doesn't mean, however, that our language and culture should change, that we allow rampant uncontrolled illegal immigration, that we bypass our laws to facilitate the speediness of the "required" treaty, etc.
Such specific items aren't paranoia or conspiracy. Paranoia stops being so when the actual fact occurs!
All President Bush has to do is be open about it.
Post a Comment