"After days of negotiations, delegates gave up their bid to agree on an "outcome document" meant to reflect their consensus on the most serious threats and the best way to fight the illegal trade in small arms, worth about $1 billion a year."
... YEEHAH! LET FREEDOM RING - MAKES ME WANNA SHOOT SOMETHIN'!
... Generally, the U.N. believes the world's small arms trade causes all armed conflict. It's the old, sadly mistaken LIBERAL belief that if all weapons are gone, the conflicts will stop. This ignores the fact that criminals, insurgents, terrorists and rebels don't follow laws that pertain to gun ownership. Therefore, as has been stated many, many times; law-abiding people will be disarmed and the bad guys will stay armed.
Also, countries have different points of view and definitions of "law-abiding, legal gun ownership". For most countries in the U.N. guns can only be owned by government officials, police officers, and government soldiers. This is what they mean we they speak of "legal gun ownership". Kofi Annan's and Prasad Kariyawasam's (Sri Lanka's U.N. ambassador and president of the conference) definition of gun ownership means all Americans must be disarmed.
... to remain in the U.N. is to accept slavery, any sane man can see that. Why do we stay there? I can only come to the conclusion that, in the end, our government is trying to slowly enslave us.
No comments:
Post a Comment